A Simple and Reliable 2D-Shear Wave Elastography and UltraSound Coefficient Attenuation Parameter Technique in Chronic Liver Diseases.

BACKGROUND: The performance and reliability criteria for Aixplorer MACH30 (SS) in chronic liver diseases (CLD) have not been validated. AIMS: The objectives were to define the optimal procedure, the accuracy for fibrosis and steatosis diagnosis, and the reliability criteria using SS. METHODS: Patients had 2D-shear wave elastography (SWE) and ultraSound-guided controlled attenuation parameter (SCAP) performed in triplicate at the mid-axillary line (MAL), posterior axillary line (PAL), and anterior axillary line (AAL). Performances of SWE and SCAP were defined using transient elastography (TE ≥ 9.5 kPa) and CAP (≥ 275 dB/m) using Fibroscan (FS) as reference and validated with liver biopsy (LB). RESULTS: FS and SS data from 203 CLD patients were analyzed (55 ± 14 years; 59% male; MASLD 58%). Median TE and CAP were 6.4 kPa (2.5-66.9) and 270 dB/m (141-400). The best technique for the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis and significant steatosis was the median of three SWE values and three SCAP values at MAL, PAL, and AAL with an AUROC of 0.96 [95% CI 0.93-0.98] and 0.91 [95% CI 0.86-0.95]. Only skin-to-liver distance ≥ 2.4 cm (p = 0.012, 95% CI 1.37-13.38) was independently associated with discordance. The accuracy of SWE (≥ 8.5 kPa) and SCAP (≥ 0.44) was analyzed in 58 patients with LB. The PPV and NPV were 50% and 94%, and 71% and 88% for fibrosis and steatosis, respectively. CONCLUSION: A reliable diagnosis of advanced fibrosis and significant steatosis can be obtained with the median of three measurements in different liver portions using SS. The only non-reliable criterion is skin-to-liver distance ≥ 2.4 cm.

Identification of high-risk subjects in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is becoming the most common liver disease worldwide, and its burden is expected to increase due to the growing epidemic of obesity and diabetes. The key challenge among NAFLD patients is to identify those with advanced fibrosis (F3F4), who are at high risk of developing complications and will benefit from specialized management and treatment with new pharmacotherapies when they are approved. Liver biopsy appears unrealistic and unsuitable in practice, given the large number of high-risk patients and its well-known limitations. Non-invasive sequential algorithms using fibrosis-4 index as first-line test, followed by vibration-controlled transient elastography or patented blood test, are the best strategy for case finding of high-risk subjects. In fact, they are now recommended by several international guidelines, and should be used and disseminated to increase awareness among physicians beyond liver clinics where most NAFLD patients are seen.

Non-invasive diagnosis of hepatic steatosis.

Non-invasive diagnosis and quantification of hepatic steatosis rely on two different but complementary approaches: biomarkers or imaging techniques, either ultrasound-based such as liver ultrasonography and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP), or computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Scores for the detection of steatosis have not gained much popularity in clinical practice so far. CAP, using the M probe, is the most promising technique but needs to be implemented with the XL probe and compared to ultrasound that, despite its limitations, remains the most widely used method. CT, owing to its low sensitivity and the fact that it involves a potential radiation hazard, is inappropriate. Finally, proton density fat fraction measurement by MRI is currently the most accurate and sensitive imaging method, simpler and more practical than magnetic resonance spectroscopy, but restricted, up to now, just to research and clinical trials.

Effectiveness and Safety of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in Chronic Hepatitis B: A 3-Year, Prospective, Real-World Study in France.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) demonstrated potent and sustainable antiviral efficacy and a good safety profile in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in controlled clinical trials. Real-world data are important to confirm effectiveness and safety data in patient populations encountered in routine clinical practice. METHODS: This non-interventional, prospective, 36-month study included treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients with CHB initiating their first TDF regimen (monotherapy or combination therapy) in routine clinical practice in France. Clinical, virologic, biochemical, compliance, and safety data were collected. RESULTS: Data from 440 consecutive patients from 58 centers were analyzed. The majority of the cohort was male (71 %), hepatitis B "e" antigen-negative (HBeAg-) (74 %), and treatment-experienced (56 %); 11 % were aged ≥65 years; and comorbidities were reported in 39 %. After 12 months, 92 % of the overall cohort achieved virologic response (HBV DNA <69 IU/mL) which was maintained to 36 months (96 %); virologic response was achieved by >90 % of patients irrespective of HBeAg status, age, or prior treatment history. At 36 months, 77 % of patients had normal alanine aminotransferase levels. Fourteen patients lost hepatis B surface (HBs) antigen, and seven seroconverted to anti-HBs. TDF was well tolerated over the 36-month study, including in 14 women who became pregnant during the study. Median estimated glomerular filtration rate did not change markedly from baseline irrespective of prior treatment history. CONCLUSIONS: TDF demonstrated potent virologic and biochemical responses across a broad range of patients reflective of routine clinical practice. The safety profile was consistent with results from pivotal trials.

Impact of ribavirin dose on retreatment of chronic hepatitis C patients.

AIM: To study the efficacy and factors associated with a sustained virological response (SVR) in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) relapsing patients. METHODS: Out of 1228 CHC patients treated with pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV), 165 (13%) had a relapse. Among these, 62 patients were retreated with PEG-IFN-α2a or -α2b and RBV. Clinical, biological, virological and histological data were collected. Initial doses and treatment modifications were recorded. The efficacy of retreatment and predictive factors for SVR were analyzed. RESULTS: An SVR was achieved in 42% of patients. SVR was higher in young (< 50 years) (61%) than old patients (27%) (P = 0.007), and in genotype 2 or 3 (57%) than in genotype 1 or 4 (28%) patients (P = 0.023). Prolonging therapy for at least 24 wk more than the previous course was associated with higher SVR rates (53% vs 28%, P = 0.04). Also, a better SVR rate was observed with RBV dose/body weight > 15.2 mg/kg per day (70% vs 35%, P = 0.04). In logistic regression, predictors of a response were age (P = 0.018), genotype (P = 0.048) and initial RBV dose/body weight (P = 0.022). None of the patients without a complete early virological response achieved an SVR (negative predictive value = 100%). CONCLUSION: Retreatment with PEG-IFN/RBV is eff-ective in genotype 2 or 3 relapsers, especially in young patients. A high dose of RBV seems to be important for the retreatment response.

Direct comparison of diagnostic performance of transient elastography in patients with chronic hepatitis B and chronic hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Accuracy of transient elastography (TE) in hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection has not been well established. We aimed to compare the performances of TE for the assessment of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic HBV or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. A secondary analysis was performed to assess whether or not alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels would impact on the accuracy of TE. METHODS: This cross-sectional study, carried out in a single centre, included treatment-naïve patients with compensated chronic HBV or HCV infection, consecutively admitted between 2006 and 2008 for a liver biopsy and TE measurement on the same day. RESULTS: A total of 202 HBV patients and 363 HCV subjects were evaluated. Overall diagnostic accuracy of TE in the HBV group was comparable to that observed in HCV patients [area under the receiver-operating characteristics (AUROCs) 0.867 ± 0.026 vs. 0.868 ± 0.019 for predicting F ≥ 2, P = 0.975; 0.902 ± 0.029 vs. 0.894 ± 0.020 for F ≥ 3, P = 0.820; and 0.935 ± 0.024 vs. 0.947 ± 0.027 for F4, P = 0.740 respectively]. TE exhibited comparable accuracies, sensitivities, specificities, predictive values and likelihood ratios in HBV and HCV groups. AUROC analysis showed no influence of ALT levels on the performance of TE in HBV individuals. ALT-specific cut-off values did not exhibit significantly higher diagnostic performances for predicting fibrosis in HBV patients with elevated ALT. CONCLUSIONS: In HBV patients, TE measurement accurately predicts the absence or presence of significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis and shows similar performances as compared to HCV patients. The use of TE cut-off values adjusted to ALT level did not improve performances for estimating liver fibrosis in HBV patients.

Twelve weeks posttreatment follow-up is as relevant as 24 weeks to determine the sustained virologic response in patients with hepatitis C virus receiving pegylated interferon and ribavirin.

UNLABELLED: A sustained virologic response (SVR) in patients with chronic hepatitis C receiving pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin is defined as undetectable serum HCV-RNA at 24 weeks (W+24) posttreatment follow-up. Viral load outcome in patients with virological relapse (VR) has not been explored. This study evaluated whether the assessment of serum HCV-RNA 12 weeks (W+12) after the end of treatment was as relevant as W+24 to evaluate SVR in 573 patients who received combination PEG-IFN and ribavirin and had a virological response at the end of treatment. Serum HCV-RNA was measured, using a new assay based on transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) with a lowest detection limit of 5-10 IU/mL, at W+12 and W+24 after the end of treatment. VR was defined as reappearance of detectable HCV-RNA at W+24 posttreatment follow-up. The positive predictive value (PPV) of undetectable serum HCV-RNA at W+12 was evaluated to identify patients with SVR, and the viral load outcome was measured in relapse patients. At the W+24 posttreatment follow-up, 408 (71%) patients had an SVR, 181 (71.2%) were treated with PEG-IFNalpha-2a and ribavirin, and 227 (71.1%) were treated with PEG-IFNalpha-2b and ribavirin. At W+12, serum HCV-RNA was undetectable in 409 patients, and 408 patients were SVR (PPV 99.7%, 95% confidence interval 99.1-100). In relapse patients, serum HCV-RNA levels were 5.623 +/- 0.748, 4.979 +/- 0.870, and 5.216 +/- 0.758 log(10) IU/mL at baseline, W+12, and W+24, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results show that the assessment of serum HCV-RNA 12 weeks after the end of treatment, using the highly sensitive TMA assay (PPV 99.7%), is as relevant as after 24 weeks to predict SVR and make decisions on the management of treated patients, suggesting a new definition for SVR.

Virological response at 4 weeks to predict outcome of hepatitis C treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin.

BACKGROUND: Viral kinetics during therapy provides information on how to individualize treatment. To determine the benefit of assessing positive predictive values (PPVs) and negative predictive values (NPVs) of rapid virological responses (RVRs) and early virological responses (EVRs), on-treatment outcomes in chronic hepatitis C patients were examined. METHODS: A total of 408 patients (221 treatment-naive) treated with pegylated interferon-alpha2b and ribavirin were included. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA was measured at baseline, 4 weeks and 12 weeks. RVR was defined as undetectable HCV RNA at 4 weeks and EVR as >/=2 log(10) decrease in HCV RNA at 12 weeks. The additive value of RVR on predicting sustained virological response (SVR) was assessed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: SVR, RVR and EVR were observed in 46%, 23% and 78% of patients, respectively. PPVs of RVR were 96%, 100% and 100% in treatment-naive patients, relapsers and non-responders, respectively. NPVs of failure to achieve EVR were 97%, 75% and 91%, in treatment-naive patients, relapsers and non-responders, respectively. At 4 weeks, patients with RVR had the highest probability to achieve SVR (odds ratio 44.98 in the entire population and 32.95 in treatment-naive patients). ROC curves showed the area under the ROC curve to be 0.758 versus 0.832 in the entire population and 0.795 versus 0.858 in treatment-naive patients at baseline versus week 4, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: RVR is a strong predictor of SVR (PPV>96%) and failure to achieve EVR is a strong predictor of non-SVR (NPV>75%), independent of patients' pretreatment status. Added to baseline characteristics, RVR increased the accuracy to predict SVR. The combination of RVR and EVR provided complementary information, and thus provides a key opportunity to individualize treatment and improve the benefit/risk ratio of therapy.